MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399388976 · doi:10.3390/jmse12060953

A Laboratory Dataset on Transport and Deposition of Spherical and Cylindrical Large Microplastics for Validation of Numerical Models

2024· article· en· W4399388976 on OpenAlexafffund
Mostafa Bigdeli, Abdolmajid Mohammadian, Abolghasem Pilechi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Marine Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicroplastics and Plastic Pollution
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMicroplasticsFlumeDeposition (geology)Environmental scienceParticle (ecology)Flow (mathematics)Marine engineeringBenchmark (surveying)Channel (broadcasting)MechanicsGeologyComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsOceanographySediment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The widespread presence of micro-sized plastic pollution has raised concerns due to their unique physical and toxic properties. Each year, water bodies carry millions of tons of plastic into the ocean. The inherent characteristics (such as size, shape, and density) of microplastics (MPs), along with flow factors like speed, depth, and pressure, significantly influence how MPs are transported and deposited. Therefore, this research aimed to gather experimental data on the transport and deposition of MPs to serve as a benchmark for numerical modeling. To achieve this goal, various test scenarios were set up in a straight channel flume to investigate different flow velocities, channel dimensions, and particle shapes. It was observed that cylindrical particles with the same density and similar size were more likely to become trapped compared to spherical particles. This study represents progress towards validating numerical models concerning the transport and deposition of microplastics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Marine Science and EngineeringSame topicMicroplastics and Plastic PollutionFrench-language works237,207