MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399389743 · doi:10.5772/intechopen.1003102

The Significance of Poor Educational Outcomes in Early Childhood as a Result of Child Abuse and Neglect

2024· book-chapter· en· W4399389743 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntechOpen eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsAlgonquin College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeglectChild abuseChildhood abusePsychologyDevelopmental psychologyChild neglectPsychiatryMedicineEnvironmental healthSuicide preventionPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several bodies of research have linked child abuse and neglect to poor educational outcomes. Child neglect may occur through: occasional inattention, chronic under-stimulation, severe neglect in a family context or neglect in an institutional care. This paper reviews articles and reports of children placed in orphanages, social welfare and underprivileged homes due to the lack parental support on psychosocial care. It addresses and builds on the impact neglect has on children’s brain development, family involvement, educational outcomes, developmental milestones and future outcomes including transition to adulthood, early marriage and employment. A history of childhood abuse and neglect predicts family disengagement, cognitive impairment, poor mental health, poor education and high rates of school dropouts leading to poor employment outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score0.983

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it