MetaPathways v3.5: Modularity and Scalability Improvements for Pathway Inference from Environmental Genomes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Over the past decade M eta P athways has advanced as a modular pipeline for constructing environmental pathway genome databases (ePGDBs), increasing our understanding of microbial metabolism at the individual, population and community levels of biological organization. With this release, we have addressed several user experience issues related to installation, module integration, and database management. With a refactored code base, M eta P athways v3.5 enhances the user experience through streamlined installation via package indexes or containers, refined modules, and interface upgrades. It boasts updated algorithm support for sequence feature prediction, annotation, metabolic inference, and coverage metrics including genome resolved metagenomes. Tested and refined on synthetic datasets, M eta P athways v3.5 demonstrates improved performance and usability; facilitating more in-depth exploration of microbial interactions and metabolic functions in environmental genomes that scales with con-temporary sequencing throughput. Availability and Implementation M eta P athways v3.5 is available via A naconda , D ocker , and A pptainer . The source code is available on B it B ucket : https://bitbucket.org/BCB2/metapathways/ The documentation is available via R ead T he D ocs : https://metapathways.readthedocs.io Contact shallam@mail.ubc.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".