MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399392836 · doi:10.31644/ed.iei.v21.2024.a03

Género, clase y etnicidad en la producción de mezcal. Una genealogía familiar en Valles Centrales, Oaxaca

2024· article· es· W4399392836 on OpenAlexaff
Verónica Vázquez García, Raquel Ramírez Castillo, Martín Hernández Juárez

Bibliographic record

VenueEntreDiversidades Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLatin American rural development
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El mezcal es una bebida espirituosa de profundo valor histórico y cultural. La mayor parte de la producción se obtiene artesanalmente en comunidades rurales e indígenas de Oaxaca, en México, donde el trabajo de las familias es fundamental. Este artículo analiza las relaciones de género, clase y etnicidad en la historia de una familia zapoteca dedicada a la producción de mezcal en San Baltazar Guelavila, Oaxaca. Los métodos utilizados fueron desde historia oral, cuestionarios, talleres, hasta entrevistas que dieron lugar a una genealogía familiar. Identificandose cinco épocas en la producción de mezcal a lo largo del siglo XX que ilustran el proceso de apropiación de productos de pueblos originarios por parte del Estado y el capital. La desigualdad de género se expresa en la invisibilidad de los aportes femeninos, el feminicidio y el acceso diferenciado de las mujeres a recursos productivos y oportunidades educativas. Se concluye resaltando la necesidad de analizar a la cultura del mezcal desde la perspectiva de interseccionalidad de género.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEntreDiversidades Revista de Ciencias Sociales y HumanidadesSame topicLatin American rural developmentFrench-language works237,207