MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399412124 · doi:10.53555/jaz.v44i1.4811

Impact Of High-Speed Power Training On Cognitive Function And Activities Of Daily Living

2023· article· en· W4399412124 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal Of Advanced Zoology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicChildren's Physical and Motor Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTraining (meteorology)Activities of daily livingFunction (biology)Power (physics)CognitionPsychologyCognitive psychologyComputer scienceGeographyNeurosciencePhysicsBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explores the cognitive function and activities of daily living   which could shed light on various aspects of functioning such as memory, thinking, problem solving and activities of daily living. Background: The average level of cognitive function in the overall population rises normally during childhood, peaks in maturity, and then declines as people age. These population- average trajectories have different general shapes depending on ability Study design: Randomized control study Aim: To assess the impact of high speed power training on cognitive function and activities of daily living among senior citizen. Objective: To evaluate the impact of high speed power training on cognitive function and activities of daily living among senior citizen. Participants: The participants were recruited on the basis of exclusion and inclusion criteria. The participants were divided in two group control group and experimental group 20 participants in each group total 40 participants were included in the study. Method: This is randomized controlled study; a total 40 participant recruited between 60-75 years of age. Participants were randomly assigned in one of 2 groups: control group with usual occupational therapy program and experimental group with power training program. Exercise intervention was conducted in 5 sessions per week, 45 min for 12 weeks. The outcomes of the intervention were assessed using MOCA and KATZ outcome measure. Result: In Montreal Cognitive Study (MOCA) pre and post in resulted that the pre mean of MOCA (14.5) accompanied by standard error (0.4947) and subsequently post mean value of MOCA increased (16.6) standard error (0.4723) and standard deviation( 2.1126) which indicate progress of post mean value (16.6) indicating an improvement to a level of cognitive function. In KATZ pre and post related that the pre mean of KATZ (3.15) accompanied by standard error (0.1666) and subsequently post mean value decrease (4.5) standard deviation (0.8271) which indicate progress of post mean vale (4.5) signifying a reduction in dependency and progress toward independence. Conclusion: This research discovered that the effect of high speed power training is more significant than only conventional occupational therapy program for cognitive and ADL abilities of senior citizen. This training helps senior citizen to improve cognition and decrease ADL dependency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it