Bibliographic record
Abstract
Toute action ou réaction face à une maladie est guidée par l'idée que nous nous en faisons, par notre façon de l'interpréter, de la penser. Cet ouvrage montre les liens entre, d'une part, les représentations sociales et médicales d'une maladie et, d'autre part, la nature des traitements proposés et les représentations de l'expérience du malade dans un contexte institutionnel de prise en charge. L'étude se concentre sur la tuberculose parce que, tout en étant moins spectaculaire que les épidémies de typhus ou de choléra, elle a néanmoins suscité une grande inquiétude dans la première moitié du XXe siècle, et ce partout en Occident. Comme le sida aujourd'hui, la tuberculose fut longtemps perçue comme un mal sournois et mortel, qui prospérait sous des conditions et dans un environnement particulier. Au Québec comme ailleurs, cette perception eut un impact certain sur les tuberculeux et sur leur expérience de la maladie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.164 | 0.138 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".