MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399421935 · doi:10.1117/12.3013771

Sliding mode and variable structure filters for signal processing: a literature review

2024· review· en· W4399421935 on OpenAlexaff
Khaled Obaideen, Waleed Hilal, S. Andrew Gadsden, Mohammad Al‐Shabi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSignal processingComputer scienceMode (computer interface)Variable (mathematics)SIGNAL (programming language)Electronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)Digital signal processingEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper will conduct an exhaustive analysis of sliding mode and variable structure filters, essential methodologies employed in signal processing that solve problems noisy and volatile environments induces. This study brings into focus the very foundations and practicality of interference filters by professional exploration of the theoretical basis, the extent of practical implementation, and the present research frontiers. It also emphasizes the critical role these filters play in making signal processing system more precise, adaptable, and resilient. The Sliding mode and the variable structure filters are optimal in the field of nonlinear problems that are augmented by interferences. These are what their purpose in noise reduction, error minimization and the system stability is. Review encompasses a wide range of applications, from robotics, aerospace to telecommunication with the aim to emphasis the variety and successfully of the filtering techniques when the signal processing is carried out in complex situations. The synthesis of the most recent achievements of the technology and discovery of the potential future directions passed down the concept of this work. The aim is to provide a push to developers to promote the implementation of the advanced application-specific solutions. And this discussion also demonstrates the flexible character that helps meet the demands of dynamic signal processing environments, forming the foundation for the next advanced systems that are adaptive and robust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MEMS and NEMS TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207