MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399422650 · doi:10.1016/j.hroo.2024.06.001

Concerns on digital health from a cardiac implantable electrical device remote monitoring clinic perspective: results from an international survey

2024· article· en· W4399422650 on OpenAlexaff
Bert Vandenberk, Neal Ferrick, Elaine Y. Wan, Sanjiv M. Narayan, Aileen M. Ferrick, Satish R. Raj

Bibliographic record

VenueHeart Rhythm O2 · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
KeywordsPerspective (graphical)Cardiac monitoringMedicineComputer scienceCardiologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past decade, there has been an exponential rise in patient utilization of digital health applications.1 Digital health is an umbrella encompassing the digital transformation of healthcare.1 Mobile health (mHealth) is a subgroup which is defined as all medical and public health practice supported by mobile devices, such as mobile phones, patient monitoring devices, and other wireless devices.1 A significant proportion of mHealth applications are focused on rhythm monitoring and analysis of heart rate as marker of wellness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeart Rhythm O2Same topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207