MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399422847 · doi:10.1016/j.gastha.2024.05.007

Association Between Social Vulnerability and Gastrointestinal Cancer Mortality in the United States Counties

2024· article· en· W4399422847 on OpenAlexafffund
Chun‐Han Lo, Kyaw Min Tun, Chun‐Wei Pan, Jeffrey K. Lee, Harminder Singh, N. Jewel Samadder

Bibliographic record

VenueGastro Hep Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaCancerCare Manitoba
FundersTakeda CanadaSandoz CanadaPfizer
KeywordsVulnerability (computing)Social vulnerabilityMortality rateDemographyMedicineGastrointestinal cancerEnvironmental healthCancerSocial determinants of healthAssociation (psychology)Public healthColorectal cancerInternal medicinePsychologyPathologySociologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background and Aims Social determinants of health contribute to disparities in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer mortality between individuals in the US. Their effects on count-level mortality rates remain uncertain. We aimed to assess the association between county social vulnerability and GI cancer mortality. Methods In this ecological study (2016–2020), we obtained US county Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) for GI cancers from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention WONDER (Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiological Research). SVI ranges from 0 to 1, with higher indices indicating greater vulnerability. We presented AAMRs by quintiles of SVIs. We used Poisson regression through generalized estimating equation to calculate rate ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for GI cancer mortality by quintiles of SVI. Results There were 799,968 deaths related to GI cancers from 2016 to 2020, resulting in an AAMR (95% CI) of 39.9 (41.4–51.2) deaths per 100,000 population. The largest concentration of counties with greater SVI and GI cancer mortality was clustered in the southern US. Counties with greater SVI had higher mortality related to all GI cancers (RR Q5 vs Q1 , 1.19 [95% CI, 1.14–1.24]), gastric cancer (1.58 [1.48–1.69]), liver cancer (1.54 [1.36–1.73]), and colorectal cancer (RR Q5 vs Q1 , 1.23 [95% CI, 1.15–1.31]). RRs for overall GI cancers were greater among individuals <45 years (1.24 [1.15–1.32]), men (1.22 [1.16–1.27]), Hispanic individuals (1.33 [1.18–1.50]), and rural counties (1.21 [1.14–1.27]) compared with their counterparts. Conclusion Socially disadvantaged counties face a disproportionately high burden of GI cancer mortality in the US. Targeted public health interventions should aim to address social inequities faced by underserved communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.390
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGastro Hep AdvancesSame topicGlobal Cancer Incidence and ScreeningFrench-language works237,207