MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399424138 · doi:10.1061/jsendh.steng-13134

Rocking Steel Column Base Connections Equipped with a Viscoplastic Damper for Seismic Resilience: Design, Modeling, and Response Assessment

2024· article· en· W4399424138 on OpenAlex
Reza Soltanabadi, Arman Mamazizi, Saber Moradi

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Structural Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResilience (materials science)ViscoplasticityDamperStructural engineeringColumn (typography)Base (topology)Seismic analysisSeismic loadingGeologyEngineeringFinite element methodMaterials scienceConnection (principal bundle)MathematicsConstitutive equationComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past research efforts have developed several self-centering beam-to-column connections for minimizing structural damage in steel moment frames after severe earthquakes. However, less focus has been on low-damage column base connections. Severe damage at the base of columns in conventional steel structures with moment frames is likely during an intense earthquake, rendering the building nonresilient. This paper evaluates the application of a recently developed viscoplastic damper in low-damage column base connections. The proposed viscoplastic damper is a rubber-steel core damper (RSCD), which consists of a high-damping rubber layer and several ductile steel bolts. The proposed column base connections prevent damage and inelastic deformations in the steel column and its base plate by allowing a rocking mechanism at the base of the column and limiting damage to easily replaceable steel bolts in the dampers. The paper discusses the design and behavior of the column base connections equipped with RSCDs. Continuum finite element models of RSCD dampers were developed and validated using experimental results. The rocking response was validated using experimental results for rocking columns with a silt damper. A total of 21 finite element models of rocking columns with RSCD were used to numerically examine the column response to combined axial loading and cyclic lateral loading. The influence of different parameters on the cyclic response of the proposed column base connections was also evaluated. These parameters are steel bolt diameter-to-length ratio (d/h), rubber thickness, column axial compressive load, number of bolts, and steel material type. The results confirmed the effectiveness of the proposed column base connection for minimizing damage to the steel column and its base plate. An optimal d/h ratio of 0.4 was found for the design of RSCDs. In addition, analytical formulas are presented to evaluate the yield and ultimate strength of the proposed column base connection, and the comparison with FEM results indicates that the presented mechanism has sufficient accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it