MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399424586 · doi:10.1117/12.3013767

Liquid crystal polarization rotators for the Miniaturized Absolute Magnetometer (MAM) of the NanoMagSat space mission

2024· article· en· W4399424586 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
P. García Parejo, Angel Jimenez-Girela, Daniel Merino-Pérez, Antonio Campos-Jara, Manuel Silva-López, Thomas Jäger, William Fourcault, F. Bertrand, Jean Michael Leger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Polarization and Ellipsometry
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetometerPolarization (electrochemistry)PhysicsLiquid crystalMaterials scienceOpticsMagnetic fieldChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liquid Crystal Polarization Rotators (LCPRs) have been developed for the Miniaturized Absolute Magnetometer (MAM) instrument in NanoMagSat project, an ESA’s SCOUT program mission. This project consists of a constellation of three nanosatellites aimed to study the Earth’s magnetic and ionospheric environment based on a 16U CubeSat-type structure. The MAM instrument is an optically pumped scalar and vector magnetometer derived from the ASM flown on the ESA Swarm mission. In this type of instruments, a device to rotate the direction of the incident linear polarization of the pumping beam injected into the helium-4 gas cell sensor is required. In NanoMagSat, the LCPRs will replace the sensor head rotor driven by a piezoelectric motor used in the ASM, allowing a very significant miniaturization of the sensor head. The LCPRs developed are miniaturized devices derived from the polarization modulators based on liquid crystals of PHI and METIS instruments on board the Solar Orbiter mission and optimized for the MAM instrument requirements. The key performance parameters of the devices have been evaluated in a validation test campaign, under the different environmental conditions expected in NanoMagSat, including the polarization rotation and the Polarization Extinction Ratio (PER) as a function of voltage, and the response times at the MAM polarization rotation scheme and will be presented in this work. Based on the results found, the LCPRs design and validation test campaign has been considered successful and they have been approved to be implemented for the NanoMagSat mission.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.252

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptical Polarization and EllipsometryFrench-language works237,207