MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399429867 · doi:10.52381/icop2024.82.1

Increases in highway maintenance costs in a permafrost environment undergoing climate change, Yukon, Canada

2024· report· en· W4399429867 on OpenAlexaffabout
Astrid Schetselaar, C. R. Burn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostSnowClearingClimate changeLandslideTerrainEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)Physical geographyGeologyGeographyOceanographyGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Assessment of infrastructure vulnerability to climate change in permafrost environments has emphasized increases in ground temperature, deepening of the active layer, and differential settlement.Hydrological factors are less emphasized.Yukon's Transportation Maintenance Database records expenses for 61 activities on the 21 maintenance sections of the territorial highway network.The costs associated with snow clearing, icing control, washout repair, and landslide removal have been examined from April 1994 to March 2022.These are directly related to climate and are primarily associated with hydrologic processes.For Yukon's entire highway network, climate-related maintenance expenditures have increased by $169,000 per year (in constant 2021 CA$) since 1994.Topography, surficial deposits, permafrost, and climate create specific sub-regional financial responses to a changing environment.For example, snow clearing expenditures are greatest for highways in the Coast Mountains region (now over $600,000 per year), icing control expenditures dominate on the Silver Trail in the discontinuous permafrost zone (over $250,000 annually), while intermittent clearing of landslides and repair of washouts are greatest for the Ogilvie section of the Dempster Highway in steeply sloping terrain and continuous permafrost ($825,000 in 2013).This paper presents expenditure profiles for seven representative maintenance camps in distinct physiographic and permafrost environments within the highway network.1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.147

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicClimate change and permafrost→French-language works237,207→