MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399432815 · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003016

Endovascular Treatment of Spetzler-Martin Grade III Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single-Center 12 years' Experience Stratified by the Spetzler-Martin Modified Scale

2024· article· en· W4399432815 on OpenAlexaff
Natália Vasconcellos de Oliveira Souza, Tabata Lamiraux, Vinicius Moreira Lima, Aymeric Rouchaud, Suzana Saleme, Charbel Mounayer

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurosurgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineEmbolizationEndovascular treatmentModified Rankin ScaleSingle CenterArteriovenous fistulaOcclusionRadiologyComplicationStenosisSurgeryArteriovenous malformationAneurysmCardiologyIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limited evidence exists for endovascular first-line treatment of Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade III brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). In this article, we sought to evaluate advanced endovascular techniques for treating SM III AVMs across different sizes, eloquence, and patterns of venous drainage. METHODS: Data from AVMs SM III treated between January 2010 and January 2022 were collected: size (S), eloquence (E), drainage (V), angioarchitecture features (arterial and venous aneurysms, venous drainage, and venous stenosis), treatment strategy (single arterial, double arterial, venous, both arterial and venous, and transvenous endovascular embolization with selective temporary flow arrest [TFATVE]), neoadjuvant treatment, and number of previous embolization sessions. AVMs were classified according to the modified SM grade as follows: small (S1V1E1/III-), medium/deep (S2V1E0/III), medium/eloquent (S2V0E1/III+), and large (S3V0E0). Treatment complications (hemorrhagic and ischemic), clinical discharge and 6-month outcomes (modified Rankin Scale 0-2, mRS), and angiographic occlusion rates were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 91 AVMs (62.6% ruptured, 72.5% S1V1E1, 7% S2V1E0, 19.7% S2V0E1, and 0% S3V0E0) in 91 patients (mean age 37 ± 15.8 years) were included. Treatment techniques included single arterial approach (28.6%), double arterial technique (30.8%), single venous strategy (9.9%), TFATVE (10.9%), and arterial and venous combined (19.8%). The angiographic occlusion rate was 91.2% (90.9% S1V1E1, 100% S2V1E0, and 88.9% S2V0E1) for all techniques, and 100% for the transvenous technique, isolated or combined with transarterial embolization. Minor complication (mRS 0-2), major complication (mRS >2), and mortality rate were 16.5%, 2.2%, and 3.4%, respectively. Overall, treatment morbimortality (mRS >2) was 3% (2/66) for S1V1E1, 0% for S2V1E0, and 16.7% (3/18) for S2V0E1. CONCLUSION: Although morbidity is non-negligible , endovascular treatment of SM grade III lesions with advanced techniques offers up to 100% rates of cure, which is of high interest, especially for ruptured deep-seated eloquent AVMs with high reruptured rates, and less amenable to microsurgery techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurosurgerySame topicVascular Malformations Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207