Early Detection of an Invasive Alien Plant ( <i>Phragmites australis</i> ) Using Unoccupied Aerial Vehicles and Artificial Intelligence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The combination of unoccupied aerial vehicles (UAVs) and artificial intelligence to map vegetation represents a promising new approach to improve the detection of invasive alien plant species (IAPS). The high spatial resolution achievable with UAVs and recent innovations in computer vision, especially with convolutional neural networks, suggest that early detection of IAPS could be possible, thus facilitating their management. In this study, we evaluated the suitability of this approach for mapping the location of common reed ( Phragmites australis subsp. australis ) within a national park located in southern Quebec, Canada. We collected data on six distinct dates during the growing season, covering environments with different levels of reed invasion. Overall, model performance was high for the different dates and zones, especially for recall (mean of 0.89). The results showed an increase in performance, reaching a peak following the appearance of the inflorescence in September (highest F1-score at 0.98). Furthermore, a decrease in spatial resolution negatively affected recall (18% decrease between a spatial resolution of 0.15 cm pixel −1 and 1.50 cm pixel −1 ) but did not have a strong impact on precision (2% decrease). Despite challenges associated with common reed mapping in a post-treatment monitoring context, the use of UAVs and deep learning shows great potential for IAPS detection when supported by a suitable dataset. Our results show that, from an operational point of view, this approach could be an effective tool for speeding up the work of biologists in the field and ensuring better management of IAPS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".