The Existence of Bissu in Bugis Culture in the Contemporary Era
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research aims to determine the form of existence and how to maintain the existence of Bissu in Bugis culture in the Contemporary Era. This research is a qualitative type with a case study research design. Data sources are the results of interviews and literature studies. The research results show that Bissu in Bugis culture in the contemporary era still has an existence which is manifested in the form of Bissu involvement in the cultural realm. Bissu often receives invitations to activities such as commemorating the anniversaries of various regions in South Sulawesi. Besides that, another way to maintain the existence of the Bissu community in Bone Regency is by holding meetings with fellow Bissu members in South Sulawesi. Meanwhile, another way that the Bissu community maintains its existence in the contemporary era is by carrying out various activities in the community, including being a bridal make-up artist, cooking, performing rituals or performances when moving house and circumcision. Also, the Bissu community in Bone Regency also carries out open member recruitment. From the various existences and ways Bissu maintains the existence community in Bone Regency, the Bissu community is also challenged in Bugis culture in the contemporary era with the clash between religious values and cultural rituals carried out by Bissu and as LGBT issues directed at Bissu.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it