Identification of novel driver risk genes in CNV loci associated with neurodevelopmental disorders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copy-number variants (CNVs) are genome-wide structural variations involving the duplication or deletion of large nucleotide sequences. While these types of variations can be commonly found in humans, large and rare CNVs are known to contribute to the development of various neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Nevertheless, given that these NDD-risk CNVs cover broad regions of the genome, it is particularly challenging to pinpoint the critical gene(s) responsible for the manifestation of the phenotype. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis of CNV data from 11,614 affected individuals with NDDs and 4,031 control individuals from SFARI database to identify 41 NDD-risk CNV loci, including 24 novel regions. We also found evidence for dosage-sensitive genes within these regions being significantly enriched for known NDD-risk genes and pathways. In addition, a significant proportion of these genes was found to (1) converge in protein-protein interaction networks, (2) be among most expressed genes in the brain across all developmental stages, and (3) be hit by deletions that are significantly over-transmitted to individuals with ASD within multiplex ASD families from the iHART cohort. Finally, we conducted a burden analysis using 4,281 NDD cases from Decipher and iHART cohorts, and 2,504 neurotypical control individuals from 1000 Genomes and iHART, which resulted in the validation of the association of 162 dosage-sensitive genes driving risk for NDDs, including 22 novel NDD-risk genes. Importantly, most NDD-risk CNV loci entail multiple NDD-risk genes in agreement with a polygenic model associated with the majority of NDD cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".