Bruxismo del sueño y apnea obstructiva del sueño. Prescripción de un dispositivo de avance mandibular desde una perspectiva dental
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El bruxismo y la apnea obstructiva del sueño son dos entidades que se presentan conjuntamente en un elevado número de pacientes. Las consecuencias de estas son relevantes tanto para la salud oral como para la salud general y la calidad de vida de los afectados. La identificación, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento forma parte esencial de la actividad clínica de los odontólogos. El uso por parte de los odontólogos de los dispositivos de avance mandibular permite el abordaje de estos dos problemas con un único dispositivo. Para el adecuado tratamiento y manejo de estos pacientes es necesario que el odontólogo tenga una adecuada formación. En este artículo de revisión presentamos un resumen actualizado de la evidencia científica sobre la asociación de bruxismo y apnea, así como del manejo por parte del odontólogo con dispositivos de avance mandibular.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".