MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399450679 · doi:10.55016/ojs/ajer.v48i1.54909

The Integration of Information and Communication Technology Into Classroom Teaching

2002· article· en· W4399450679 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Scott A. Reid

Bibliographic record

VenueAlberta Journal of Educational Research · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOnline and Blended Learning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInformation and Communications TechnologyPaceInformation technologyTechnology integrationMathematics educationQualitative researchTeaching methodSubject (documents)Information overloadPsychologyPedagogySchool teachersSociologyComputer scienceSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study provides new images of teachers who are pioneers in the use of information and communication technology (ICT) in the classes they teach. This qualitative study looks at teachers in a high school that is a leader in using information technology in the classroom. The findings indicate that most of the teachers participating in this study were enthusiastic about the possibilities ICT holds for classroom use. Examples are given to illustrate how information technology is being used in this school to enhance classroom teaching in several subject areas. Concerns teachers have about the use of technology were identified as issues that could determine the success or failure of the use of ICT in high schools. These concerns include: maintenance, inequalities, the need for training, information overload, the pace of change and stress, plagiarism, business involvement, and teachers' time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0110.007
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.430
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlberta Journal of Educational ResearchSame topicOnline and Blended LearningFrench-language works237,207