MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399453034 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2024.3409729

Machine-Learning-Reinforced Massively Parallel Transient Simulation for Large-Scale Renewable-Energy-Integrated Power Systems

2024· article· en· W4399453034 on OpenAlexafffund
Tianshi Cheng, Ruogu Chen, Ning Lin, Tian Liang, Venkata Dinavahi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsPowertech Labs (Canada)RTDS Technologies (Canada)University of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacs
KeywordsRenewable energyMassively parallelTransient (computer programming)Electric power systemComputer scienceScale (ratio)Power system simulationTransient analysisWind powerPower (physics)Electrical engineeringEngineeringTransient responseParallel computingPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renewable energy systems (RESs) are pivotal in the transition to eco-friendly smart grids. The complexity and uncertainty of RESs, driven by uncontrollable natural forces like sunlight and wind, bring challenges to integrating RESs into modern power systems. Electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation is an effective method for studying the integration of RESs. Currently, the EMT simulation of RESs is limited to small-scale and lumped RES models due to the model complexity and nonlinearity, which cannot reflect the detailed characteristics of large-scale RESs in practice. This paper introduces a data-oriented, machine learning-enhanced approach to achieve massively parallel EMT simulation on CPU-GPU, designed to efficiently model and simulate large-scale, detailed RES. It incorporates data-driven machine learning modeling of RES via artificial neural networks and integrates these models using a data-oriented entity-component-system framework. The model training was based on reliable model data produced by traditional physical EMT models and the results were validated with MATLAB/Simulink. The RES components are grouped into a microgrid connected to a synthetic AC/DC system based on the IEEE 118-Bus system, achieving an acceleration performance of 400 times faster than traditional CPU nonlinear iterative computations with 2 million RES entities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207