Leaf‐Inspired Hetero‐Structure WS <sub>2</sub> /WO <sub>3</sub> In Situ Embedded on Pomelo Peel Derived Carbon for Supercapacitor and Capacitive Deionization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Composite materials have occupied a reliable position in electrochemical energy storage and conversion due to their double electric layer and pseudocapacitance. In this work, a leaf‐like heterostructure composite, obtained by peeling – carbonizing – in situ sulfuration/oxidation approach for the first time, is investigated as electrode material for electrochemical capacitance behavior. The thin and highly active transition metal WS 2 acts as an energetic “blade” to trap free ions, which are then transported across the material through a strong “tendon skeleton” WO 3 . The derived carbon PPC with a large aspect ratio holds up the overall leaf structure, also as a “warehouse” for ion storage, thus enhancing the conductivity and wettability of the material. The above three (WS 2 +WO 3 +PPC) synergistically provide outstanding double‐layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance. In particular, the vacancy defects, constructed at the heterogenous interface from WS 2 ‐WO 3 in situ growth, can still achieve superior ion absorption/desorption ability even under large current density and high concentration brackish solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".