White Matter Microstructural Correlates of Cognitive and Motor Functioning Revealed via Multimodal Multivariate Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Recent advances in cognitive neuroscience emphasise the importance of healthy white matter (WM) for optimal behavioural functioning. It is now widely accepted that brain connectivity via WM contributes to the emergence of behaviour. However, the association between the microstructure of WM fibres and behaviour is poorly understood due to the indirect and overlapping nature of methods used to assess microstructure. Here, we used the Mahalanobis Distance (D2) to integrate 10 metrics of WM derived from multimodal neuroimaging that have strong ties to microstructure. The D2 metric was chosen because it accounts for metrics’ covariance as it measures the voxelwise distance between every subject and the average; thus providing a robust multiparametric assessment of microstructure. We used multivariate correlation to examine voxelwise WM-behaviour associations with two cognitive and two motor tasks, which allowed us to compare within and across behavioural domains. We observed that behaviour is organised in cognitive, motor, and integrative components that have widespread associations with WM, from frontal to parietal regions. Notably, the decomposition of these factors shows that tasks traditionally labelled as cognitive also contain motor components that map onto motor-related WM patterns, and that motor tasks likewise contain non-motor components linked to distinct WM microstructural features. Our results highlight the complex nature of the links between microstructure and behaviour, and support the relevance of multivariate modelling when examining brain-behaviour associations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".