Localized electrocortical activity as a function of single-leg squat phases and its relationship to knee frontal plane stability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigated differences in electroencephalography (EEG) activity within motor-related brain areas during three phases of a single-leg squat (SLS)—i.e., descending, holding, and ascending phases. Specifically, utilizing advanced magnetic resonance imaging guided EEG source localization techniques and markerless motion capture technology, we explored the interplay between concurrently recorded lower-extremity biomechanics and brain activity. Among the phases of a nondominant leg SLS, differences in contralateral brain activity (right hemisphere) were found in the activity of the precentral gyrus, the postcentral gyrus, and the sensory motor area. Alternatively, during the dominant SLS leg, differences among the three SLS phases in contralateral brain activity were fewer. Hemispheric dependent brain activity also significantly correlated with participants’ knee valgus angle range of motion (right hemisphere) and peak knee valgus angles (left hemisphere). In addition to the novel brain and biomechanical findings, this study sheds light on the technical feasibility of recording EEG during complex multi-joint movements and its potential applications in understanding sensorimotor behavior.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".