MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399477014 · doi:10.1016/j.coelec.2024.101553

Electrocatalysts for the oxidation of ethanol in proton exchange membrane fuel cells, electrolysis cells, and sensors

2024· article· en· W4399477014 on OpenAlexafffund
Peter G. Pickup, E. Bradley Easton

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Electrochemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech UniversityMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsElectrolysisAcetaldehydeEthanol fuelProton exchange membrane fuel cellDirect-ethanol fuel cellChemistryEthanolCatalysisCommodity chemicalsHydrogen productionFuel cellsNanotechnologyMaterials scienceChemical engineeringElectrodeOrganic chemistryEngineeringElectrolyte

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The potential for direct ethanol fuel cells (DEFCs) to provide sustainable, widely accessible power has driven development electrocatalysts for the ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) over several decades. However, low power output, low efficiencies, and the production of acetic acid and acetaldehyde byproducts has caused progress to stall. Consequently, interest in this area is transitioning to electrolysis of ethanol to produce green hydrogen and commodity chemicals. Concurrently, applications of DEFC as breath alcohol sensors in breathalyzers are increasing, and this has become an established commercial market for EOR catalysts. Progress in the development of these technologies has been hampered by the limited number of catalysts that have been evaluated in proton exchange membrane cells, the paucity of data on product distributions, and limited gas-phase-sensing studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in ElectrochemistrySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207