MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399478204 · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zgvyt

Computational speech markers of negative symptoms show evidence of being robust to antipsychotic dose and extrapyramidal symptoms in schizophrenia

2024· preprint· en· W4399478204 on OpenAlexaff
Michael J. Spilka, Jessica Robin, Amir Hossein Nikzad, Leily Behbehani, Sarah Berretta, Mengdan Xu, John M. Kane, William Simpson, Sunny X. Tang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntipsychoticSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)Frequentist inferencePsychologyExtrapyramidal symptomsAudiologyAssociation (psychology)Clinical psychologyBayesian probabilityMedicinePsychiatryBayesian inferenceArtificial intelligenceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is increasing interest in using computational speech and language analysis for the objective assessment of symptom severity in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD), including negative symptom severity. However, the extent to which antipsychotic side effects influence speech markers of negative symptoms is unclear. This study investigated associations between computational speech and negative symptom severity, and examined whether speech features are associated with antipsychotic dose and extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS). Sixty-seven participants with SSD completed speech-focused tasks and clinical assessment. Seventeen speech features capturing relevant acoustic, timing, and linguistic characteristics were extracted from participant responses and examined for associations with negative symptoms, EPS, and antipsychotic dose. Eight timing features and one linguistic feature were significantly correlated with negative symptom severity (p < .05, false-discovery-rate-corrected; FDR), and these relationships were specific to negative symptoms rather than overall psychiatric symptom severity. No features were significantly correlated with antipsychotic dose or EPS after FDR correction, and Bayesian analyses provided moderate evidence for the null hypothesis (i.e., absence of an association) for most features. Two features showed Bayesian evidence for the alternative hypothesis, however; the association between speech and negative symptoms remained significant after removing the clinical covariate effects. The results provide support for computational speech markers of negative symptom severity, and both frequentist and Bayesian evidence that these speech markers are generally not confounded by antipsychotic side effects. The results help advance the clinical validation of computational speech assessment and analysis for measuring negative symptom severity in SSD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSchizophrenia research and treatment→French-language works237,207→