Impact of renal impairment (RI) on pharmacokinetics (PK) and clinical outcomes with mezigdomide plus dexamethasone (DEX) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
7539 Background: RI is a common complication in MM and may alter drug elimination, leading to increased systemic exposures, risk of adverse events (AEs), and dosing adjustments. The novel CELMoD agent mezigdomide (MEZI) is being investigated alone or with DEX in the CC-92480-MM-001 (NCT03374085) phase 1/2 trial. MEZI has shown dose-dependent linear PK with rapid absorption and is mainly eliminated through hepatic metabolism, with renal elimination playing a smaller role. Here we investigate the impact of RI on the efficacy, safety, and PK of MEZI + DEX in RRMM. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had RRMM, ≥ 3 prior lines of therapy, triple-class refractoriness, and disease progression ≤ 60 days of last therapy. Pts were stratified by creatinine clearance (CrCl), excluding those with CrCl < 45 mL/min or needing dialysis. Oral MEZI (1 mg) was given on days 1–21 per 28-day cycle + weekly DEX. MEZI doses were not adjusted based on RI. Responses, AEs, and PK were assessed descriptively over the full population and in pts with no RI (CrCl ≥ 90 mL/min), mild RI (CrCl 60–< 90 mL/min), and moderate RI (CrCl 30–< 60 mL/min) at baseline. MEZI clearance and PK exposure were estimated from an integrated population PK model. PK exposure parameters were stratified by chronic kidney disease (CKD) staging. Results: 101 pts received MEZI + DEX in the dose-expansion cohort; 37 had no RI, 41 had mild RI, and 23 had moderate RI. Grade (Gr) 3/4 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) were similar, occurring in 91.1% (overall), 89.2% (no RI), 90.2% (mild RI), and 95.7% (moderate RI) of pts. TEAEs were mostly hematologic, with neutropenia the most common Gr 3/4 TEAE; its occurrence did not differ in no RI (75.7%), mild RI (75.6%), and moderate RI (73.9%) cohorts. Non-hematologic Gr 3/4 TEAEs were low. Eighty-nine (88.1%) and 32 (31.7%) pts had MEZI dose interruptions and reductions, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 40.6% in all pts, 56.8% in no-RI pts, 29.3% in mild-RI pts, and 34.8% in moderate-RI pts (Table). Evaluated as a continuous variable, CrCl showed no apparent relationship with MEZI oral clearance or systemic exposures. This was supported by subgroup evaluation of MEZI exposures by CKD stage. Results showed MEZI exposures in mild or moderate RI are consistent with no RI. Conclusions: Based on renal function, there was no adverse trend between efficacy, safety, and PK of MEZI + DEX. MEZI dose modifications are likely not required for pts with mild to moderate RI. Clinical trial information: NCT03374085 . [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".