Real-world barriers to CAR-T access: A Canadian referral center perspective.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e19002 Background: CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) is the standard of care for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) beyond second line therapy. Access to CAR-T remains a significant barrier for patients and is limited by the numbers of CAR-T centers, patient comorbidities and lymphoma kinetics. This study aims to define clinical features associated with CAR-T ineligibility and associated outcomes in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a single center retrospective study of all adult patients with R/R LBCL referred at Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont in Montreal, Canada, for CAR-T between July 2019 and December 2023. Comprehensive data were gathered from electronic medical records. This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. Results: A total of 235 patients were evaluated: 133 (57%) were infused, 10 (4%) were apheresed but not infused and 92 (39%) patients were deemed ineligible and further analyzed. The main reasons for ineligibility were ECOG performance score more than 1 (n=23), comorbidities (n=18), not R/R to two prior lines of therapy (LOT) (n=15) and rapid disease progression (n=15). Prohibitive comorbidities included: creatinine clearance <45ml/min (n=13), left ventricular ejection fraction <45% (n=2), unstable coronary artery disease (n=1), severe valvular disease (n=1) and Child B cirrhosis (n=1). 10 declined CAR-T and 10 were diagnosed or had lymphoma subtypes not covered by CAR-T reimbursement criteria: grade 3B follicular lymphoma (n=5), T-cell lymphoma (n=2), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=1), Richter from chronic lymphocytic leukemia (n=1) and transformed marginal zone lymphoma (n=1). 33 had more than one exclusion criteria. Median age at referral was 66 years (range: 25-87). Median IPI at diagnosis (available in 74%) was 3 (range: 0-5). At CAR-T evaluation, 77 patients had a stage 3 or 4 disease and 7 had CNS involvement. Median LOT for LBCL were 2 (range: 0-5), 46 were primary refractory and 23 relapsed within 12 months. 18 patients had undergone prior high dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT). 6 were exposed to novel therapies (polatuzumab=6, mosunetuzumab=2). Median follow-up after CAR-T exclusion was 4.25 months (range: 0-49.2). 50 (68% of patients with B-cell lymphoma R/R to at least 2 LOT) were deceased at time of analysis. Data on further LOT was available for 22 patients: 10 received novel therapies (tafasitamab=5, polatuzumab=3, mosunetuzumab=1, alectinib=1), 6 HDT-ASCT, 3 allogeneic stem cell transplant, 4 conventional chemotherapies and 2 radiation therapy. Conclusions: 39% of evaluated patients with R/R LBCL were ineligible for CAR-T mainly due to poor performance status, comorbidities and prohibitive progressive disease. Our study did not capture patients not referred due to geographical considerations but highlights dismal outcomes for patients ineligible for CAR-T. Widespread access to novel therapies is awaited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".