Robust Feature Selection for BP Estimation in Multiple Populations: Towards Cuffless Ambulatory BP Monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Current blood pressure (BP) estimation methods have not achieved an accurate and adaptable approach for ambulatory diagnosis and monitoring applications of populations at risk of cardiovascular disease, generally due to a limited sample size. This paper introduces an algorithm for BP estimation solely reliant on photoplethysmography (PPG) signals and demographic features. It automatically obtains signal features and employs the Markov Blanket (MB) feature selection to discern informative and transmissible features, achieving a robust space adaptable to the population shift. This approach was validated with the Aurora-BP database, compromising ambulatory wearable cuffless BP measurements for over 500 individuals. After evaluating several machine-learning regression methods, Gradient Boosting emerged as the most effective. According to the MB feature selection, temporal, frequency, and demographic features ranked highest in importance, while statistical ones were deemed non-significant. A comparative assessment of a generic model (trained on unclassified BP data) and specialized models (tailored to each distinct BP population), demonstrated a consistent superiority of our proposed MB feature space with a mean absolute error of [Formula: see text] for systolic BP and [Formula: see text] for diastolic BP on the whole dataset. Moreover, we present a first comparison of in-clinic vs. ambulatory models, with performance significantly lower for the latter with a drop of [Formula: see text] in systolic ( ) and [Formula: see text] for diastolic ( ) estimation errors. This work contributes to the resilient understanding of BP estimation algorithms from PPG signals, providing causal features in the signal and quantifying the disparities between ambulatory and in-clinic measurements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".