MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399487999 · doi:10.22318/icls2024.481571

Turning Points Along Embodied Pathways: Bringing Forth Children’s Voices Through Artistic Ways of Listening

2024· article· en· W4399487999 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Luke Muscat

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings. · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarly Childhood Education and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsEmbodied cognitionActive listeningAestheticsCognitive scienceComputer scienceVisual artsSociologyHuman–computer interactionCommunicationArtPsychologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes a critical arts-based learning experience for a group of children between 5-and 7-years-old who co-authored and enacted a short story through movement, drama, music, and visual art during a 2-week summer dance camp I co-designed with other artists in a major Northeastern metropolitan city.Following children's embodied pathways, I find turning points in children's artistic journeys where embodied and relational encounters reoriented their movements in personally meaningful ways.Turning points along embodied pathways reveal children's dialogic experiences with artistic forms of representation as personally meaningful in their learning and being, bringing forth children's embodied voices by decentering adult conventions of dialogue and voice.My findings encourage learning scientists to explore artistic ways of listening to children's dialogic experiences through centering children's epistemologies in learning design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueProceedings.Same topicEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207