MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399489695 · doi:10.1016/j.tcr.2024.101072

Pipkin IV fracture dislocation of the hip in a football athlete – A case report

2024· article· en· W4399489695 on OpenAlexaff
Alice Wang, Amy Leith, David J. Stockton, Jordan Leith

Bibliographic record

VenueTrauma Case Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHip disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalVancouver Coastal HealthUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineFootballRehabilitationPhysical therapyReduction (mathematics)Football playersRadiographyHigh energyHip fractureSurgeryOsteoporosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pipkin type IV fracture dislocation of the hip is a rare, high-energy injury, that is associated with poor functional outcomes and complications. We report a case of a 20-year old male quarterback who sustained a Pipkin type IV fracture dislocation during a football game. He underwent immediate closed reduction, transfer to a Level I trauma centre, surgical management, and progressive rehabilitation. Clinical and radiographic assessments were carried out periodically for 1 year. At 10 months post-injury, the athlete returned to full-time play as the starting quarterback of his University football team. He completed a pain-free season at 1-year post-injury. Clinical and radiographic evaluations demonstrated appropriate healing with no complications. Despite the high-energy and often devastating nature of Pipkin Type IV injuries, this case report demonstrates that prompt, appropriate management and rehabilitation of this injury in a University quarterback led to positive functional outcomes. Further studies on the treatment and outcomes of this rare sport injury are needed to optimize management.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.475

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrauma Case ReportsSame topicHip disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207