MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399491111 · doi:10.56885/lopa8385

Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) In Wound Care: An Interview With Andrew Springer, Chair, Wounds Canada

2024· article· en· W4399491111 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Andrew E. Springer, Christina Locmelis, Mariam Botros

Bibliographic record

VenueWound Care Canada · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)Inclusion (mineral)Diversity (politics)SociologyPsychologyGerontologyMedicinePolitical scienceGender studiesAnthropologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andrew Springer is the current Chair of Wounds Canada. He is also Wounds Canada’s first BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour) Chair, and has been a member of the organization since 2013, serving on the Board for approximately ten years. In recognition of Black History Month in Canada in February of this 2024, Wound Care Canada interviewed Andrew, asking him to reflect on his experiences and vision for the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0430.015
Scholarly communication0.0100.007
Open science0.0020.009
Research integrity0.0050.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWound Care CanadaSame topicDiagnosis and Treatment of Venous DiseasesFrench-language works237,207