MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399494170 · doi:10.1115/1.4065694

Special Issue: Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Advanced Manufacturing

2024· article· en· W4399494170 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Y. B. Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMachine Learning in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsManufacturing engineeringEngineeringEngineering ethicsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Yuebin GuoYuebin Guo This Special Issue serves as a bridge between the ASME Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering (JMSE) and the global community of artificial intelligence manufacturing researchers. The primary objective of the Special Issue is to collect high-level scientific articles in the emerging area of physics-informed machine learning (PIML) for advanced manufacturing and push the boundaries of knowledge. Contributions are sought in recent advances, challenges, and future directions of PIML model development at the levels of processes, machines, and systems.A team of Guest Editors has been setup to collect as diverse selection articles as possible. The team is led by Professor Yuebin Guo (Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ) and consists of Professor Yusuf Altintas (The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada), Professor Qing Chang (University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA), Professor Robert Gao (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH), Professor Weihong Grace Guo (Rutgers University-New Brunswick, Piscataway, NJ), Dr. Andy Henderson (Hendtech LLC, Greenville, SC), Dr. Jaydeep Karandikar (Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN), and Professor Tony Schmitz (University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN).While this collection of articles represents only an initiative to define and shape the nascent area of PIML for advanced manufacturing, it demonstrates a snapshot of the current landscape of the vibrant area. These articles cover a wide array of PIML topics, including forward and inverse predictions, uncertainty quantification and Bayesian optimization, data assimilation, process optimization, machine dynamics, quality control, and reduced-order models. The collection of articles is from Oct. 2023 to Jan. 2024. Each article underwent a rigorous peer review process, which is a hallmark of JMSE.The Guest Editors would like to acknowledge JMSE Editor-in-Chief Professor Albert Shih for providing timely consultation and feedback during the process. We also want to acknowledge Jennifer Smith and Emily Bosco, who provided continuous and timely editorial assistance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.250
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Manufacturing Science and EngineeringSame topicMachine Learning in Materials ScienceFrench-language works237,207