MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract A024: SOX11: An <i>Achilles heel</i> of mantle cell lymphoma enhancing sensitivity to DNA damaging agents by impairing DNA repair

2024· article· en· W4399505149 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohammad HA Morsy, Virginia Amador, Birger Christensson, Nikolas Herold, Birgitta Sander

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChromatinDNA damageHomologous recombinationTranscription factorCell biologyDNA repairBiologyHistoneDNA-binding domainMolecular biologyCancer researchChemistryDNAGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive malignancy with mature B-cell differentiation and a median overall survival of 5 years. A characteristic hallmark of MCL is the aberrant expression of the transcription factor sex determining region on Y chromosome (SRY)-related and high mobility group (HMG) domain containing protein 11 (SOX11) in approximately 90% of the cases. The role of SOX11 in MCL pathogenesis has been attributed to transcriptional dysregulation, ultimately driving malignant gene expression profile of MCL. However, little is known about the potential transcription factor-independent modes of action of SOX11. Our co-immunprecipitation and proteomic analysis showed that SOX11 binds to factors of DNA damage response (DDR), nucleosome remodeling and chromatin regulation, among others. Sterile Alpha motif and HD domain containing protein 1 (SAMHD1) is top-listed among the SOX11 binding partners in MCL. We recently showed that SOX11 binds via its HMG domain to SAMHD1, disturbing its homo-tetramerization. A growing body of evidence unveiled the implication of SAMHD1 in DDR, particularly in promoting homologous recombination. Immunofluorescent imaging showed that SOX11 impairs homologous recombination in MCL, evidenced by reduced accumulation of RAD51 foci upon chromatin in response to treatment with the topoisomerase1 inhibitor camptothecin (CPT). This was further consistent with abrogated phosphorylation of DNA-break binding protein RPA32 (S4/8), but not total RPA32, in response to CPT treatment in SOX11-positive conditions. Inducing SOX11 expression in SOX11-negative MCL cell line (JVM-2) resulted in increased accumulation of cytosolic single-stranded DNA upon CPT treatment. This was translated in an enhanced sensitivity to CPT in SOX11-expressing MCL cell lines as compared to SOX11-negative conditions. Moreover, this enhanced sensitivity was reflected in increased levels of cleaved PARP1, cleaved caspase 3 and persistent γ-H2A.X in SOX11-positive cells. Simian Immunodeficiency Virus protein (Vpx)-mediated depletion of SAMHD1 yielded a similar, yet attenuated, sensitive phenotype to CPT compared to SOX11 induction in JVM-2. SAMHD1 depletion in addition to SOX11 induction showed no significant additional impact on the response to CPT in JVM-2 under the conditions tested. Intriguingly, T592 phosphorylation of SAMHD1 was reduced upon inducing SOX11 expression in JVM-2, suggesting a mode of action by which SOX11 inhibits SAMHD1. However, the mechanism behind increased levels of SAMHD1 post-translational modification upon SOX11 induction requires further investigation. Altogether, our findings suggest that SOX11 may impair homologous recombination, at least in part, through inhibiting SAMHD1. These results highlight SOX11 as an Achilles heel that renders MCL vulnerable to DNA damaging and suggest that incorporating DNA damaging agents including topoisomerase inhibitors or anthracyclines into currently used treatment modalities for MCL might be clinically beneficial. Citation Format: HA Morsy, Virginia Amador, Birger Christensson, Nikolas Herold, Birgitta Sander. SOX11: An Achilles heel of mantle cell lymphoma enhancing sensitivity to DNA damaging agents by impairing DNA repair [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Expanding and Translating Cancer Synthetic Vulnerabilities; 2024 Jun 10-13; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(6 Suppl):Abstract nr A024.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207