Penentuan Aktivitas Antioksidan dari Tiga Jenis Simplisia Jahe (Gajah, Emprit, Merah) untuk Pengobatan Tradisional Chinese Medicine (TCM)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Jahe merupakan tanaman yang banyak dibudidayakan di Indonesia. Rimpang jahe diketahui mempunyai banyak khasiatnya terhadap kesehatan. Jahe sering dijumpai dalam racikan pengobatan Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Hal ini ada kaitannya dengan kandungan antioksidan pada jahe. Tujuan Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan aktivitas antioksidan pada simplisia tiga jenis simplisia jahe (gajah, emprit, merah). Metode Tiga jahe diberikan perlakuan yaitu sortasi basah dan kering, pembuatan simplisia, karakterisasi simplisia, uji aktivitas antioksidan menggunakan metode 2,2-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH). Hasil rendemen simplisia tiga jahe (gajah 19,00%, emprit 15,26%, merah 12,61%), pengujian kadar air simplisia dari tiga jahe (gajah 7,315 %, emprit 7,439%, merah 8,576 %) selanjutnya pada penentuan uji aktivitas antioksidan jahe gajah 77,03%, jahe emprit 61,91%, jahe merah 67,94%. aktivitas Aktivitas antioksidan dari ketiga jahe dengan metode DPPH menunjukkan nilai inhibitory concentration (IC50 ) mempunyai kategori kuat yaitu ada diantara 50-100 µg/ml.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it