Lung sparing in MR-guided non-adaptive SBRT treatment of peripheral lung tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Objective. We aim to: (1) quantify the benefits of lung sparing using non-adaptive magnetic resonance guided stereotactic body radiotherapy (MRgSBRT) with advanced motion management for peripheral lung cancers compared to conventional x-ray guided SBRT (ConvSBRT); (2) establish a practical decision-making guidance metric to assist a clinician in selecting the appropriate treatment modality. Approach. Eleven patients with peripheral lung cancer who underwent breath-hold, gated MRgSBRT on an MR-guided linear accelerator (MR linac) were studied. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)-based retrospective planning using an internal target volume (ITV) was performed to simulate ConvSBRT, which were evaluated against the original MRgSBRT plans. Metrics analyzed included planning target volume (PTV) coverage, various lung metrics and the generalized equivalent unform dose (gEUD). A dosimetric predictor for achievable lung metrics was derived to assist future patient triage across modalities. Main results. PTV coverage was high (median V100% > 98%) and comparable for both modalities. MRgSBRT had significantly lower lung doses as measured by V20 (median 3.2% versus 4.2%), mean lung dose (median 3.3 Gy versus 3.8 Gy) and gEUD. Breath-hold, gated MRgSBRT resulted in an average reduction of 47% in PTV volume and an average increase of 19% in lung volume. Strong correlation existed between lung metrics and the ratio of PTV to lung volumes (R PTV/Lungs ) for both modalities, indicating that R PTV/Lungs may serve as a good predictor for achievable lung metrics without the need for pre-planning. A threshold value of R PTV/Lungs < 0.035 is suggested to achieve V20 < 10% using ConvSBRT. MRgSBRT should otherwise be considered if the threshold cannot be met. Significance. The benefits of lung sparing using MRgSBRT were quantified for peripheral lung tumors; R PTV/Lungs was found to be an effective predictor for achievable lung metrics across modalities. R PTV/Lungs can assist a clinician in selecting the appropriate modality without the need for labor-intensive pre-planning, which has significant practical benefit for a busy clinic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".