The Ottawa River Gneiss Complex revisited: definition of the metamorphic core and detachment zone of a large Grenvillian metamorphic core complex
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using new and published data, we synthesize the tectonic evolution of the Ottawa River Gneiss Complex (ORGC), the metamorphic core and detachment zone of a large mid- to late-Ottawan metamorphic core complex in the western Grenville Province. Field and petrologic data indicative of retrogression and exhumation, combined with maps and schematic crustal-scale sections, are used to document spatial and temporal relationships of multi-scale structures developed during its formation, of which the largest, termed mega-cross-folds and megaboudins, occur within and define the detachment zone. Mega-cross-folds, orogen-normal structures up to 70 km in length with coaxial constrictional fabrics in their hinge-lines, formed in a single phase of deformation during retrogression and exhumation. A cluster of asymmetric megaboudins, individually from 10–50 km long with granulite-facies cores and high-strain amphibolite-facies rims, similarly formed during syntectonic retrogression and exhumation of granulite-facies precursors. We argue the mega-cross-folds developed in a regime of regional transtension, whereas the megaboudin cluster formed by extensional inversion of an anastomosing early-Ottawan thrust system, with the strain patterns of both suggesting the detachment zone was the site of intense ductile flow between the stronger metamorphic core and cover. Comparison of these results with generic numerical models of extensional collapse of overthickened continental crust suggests the first-order tectonometamorphic features of the ORGC developed during necking of the upper crust and associated large-scale extensional flow of the mid and lower crust into the domiform necked region during collapse of the early-Ottawan thrust stack.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".