Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper addresses the design of transmit precoder and receive combiner matrices to support <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N_{\rm s}$</tex-math></inline-formula> independent data streams over a time-division duplex (TDD) point-to-point massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) channel with either a fully digital or a hybrid structure. The optimal precoder and combiner design amounts to finding the top-<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$N_{\rm s}$</tex-math></inline-formula> singular vectors of the channel matrix, but the explicit estimation of the entire high-dimensional channel would require significant pilot overhead. Alternatively, prior works suggest to find the precoding and combining matrices directly by exploiting channel reciprocity and by using the power iteration method, but its performance degrades in the low SNR regime. To tackle this challenging problem, this paper proposes a learning-based active sensing framework, where the transmitter and the receiver send pilots alternately using sensing beamformers that are actively designed as functions of previously received pilots. This is accomplished by using recurrent neural networks to summarize information from the historical observations into hidden state vectors, then using fully connected neural networks to learn the appropriate sensing beamformers in the next pilot stage and finally the transmit precoding and receive combiner matrices for data communications. Simulations demonstrate that the learning-based method outperforms existing approaches significantly and maintains superior performance even in the low SNR regime for both the fully digital and hybrid MIMO scenarios.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".