MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399527336 · doi:10.1109/jstars.2024.3411994

Field-Scale Precision: Predicting Grain Yield of Diverse Wheat Breeding Lines Using High-Throughput UAV Multispectral Imaging

2024· article· en· W4399527336 on OpenAlexafffund
Nisar Ali, Ahmed Mohammed, Abdul Bais, Samia Berraies, Yuefeng Ruan, Richard D. Cuthbert, Jatinder S. Sangha

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Regina
FundersManitoba Crop AllianceSaskatchewan Wheat Development CommissionMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsMultispectral imageThroughputRemote sensingScale (ratio)Grain yieldYield (engineering)Field (mathematics)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceAgronomyMaterials scienceGeologyMathematicsBiologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study explored how to use UAV-based multispectral imaging, a plot detection model, and machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict wheat grain yield at the field scale. Multispectral data were collected over several weeks using the MicaSense RedEdge-P camera. Ground truth data on vegetation indices were collected utilizing portable phenotyping instruments, and agronomic data were collected manually. The YOLOv8 detection model was utilized for field-scale wheat plot detection. Four ML algorithms—decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), gradient boosting (GB), and extreme GB (XGBoost were used to evaluate wheat grain yield prediction using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference red edge index (NDRE), and green NDVI (G-NDVI) data. The results demonstrated the RF algorithm's predicting ability across all growth stages, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 43 grams per plot (g/p) and a coefficient of determination (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>) value of 0.90 for NDVI data. For NDRE data, DT outperformed other models, with an RMSE of 43 g/p and an <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> of 0.88. GB exhibited the highest predictive accuracy for G-NDVI data, with an RMSE of 42 g/p and an <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$R^{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula> value of 0.89. The study integrated isogenic bread wheat sister lines and checked cultivars differing in grain yield, grain protein, and other agronomic traits to facilitate the identification of high-yield performers. The results show the potential use of UAV-based multispectral imaging combined with a detection model and ML in various precision agriculture applications, including wheat breeding, agronomy research, and broader agricultural practices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207