MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Utilizing Artificial Intelligence in Telemedicine for Efficient Remote Diagnosis and Treatment Plan

2024· article· en· W4399529565 on OpenAlexaff
V Asha, Ippa Sumalatha, Anshoo Mishra, H Pal Thethi, Ravi Kalra, Muntather Almusawi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelemedicineComputer sciencePlan (archaeology)Artificial intelligenceHealth care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To facilitate dynamic and adaptive remote diagnosis and treatment planning, the “Dynamic Adaptive Diagnosis and Treatment (DADT)” approach uses three fundamental AI algorithms that operate in tandem with one another. The cornerstone is the Intelligent Symptom Analysis Algorithm (ISAA), which uses patient-reported symptoms and medical history to make diagnostic determinations. The Adaptive Treatment Recommender (ATR) algorithm constantly adjusts prescribed treatments considering patient feedback, research findings, and new standards of care. In order to constantly learn from fresh data and update diagnostic and treatment models, the Continuous Learning Diagnostic Network (CLDN) makes use of a neural network. Accurate diagnosis and individualized treatment planning are the goals of the suggested technique, which is intended for use in distant healthcare settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIFrench-language works237,207