Relation between Patients’ Compliance and Their Outcomes Post Total Hip Replacement Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Total hip replacement is one of the most cost-effective and consistently successful surgeries performed in orthopedics. It provides reliable outcomes specifically pain relief, functional restoration, and overall improved patient's health status. Aim of the study: Assessment of relation between patients’ compliance and their outcomes post total hip replacement surgery. Research design: Descriptive correlation study was utilized. Setting: The study was conducted at orthopedic surgery departments (2, 3) and joint outpatient clinic in El Demerdash hospital affiliated to Ain Shams University Hospitals. Subjects: A purposive sample of (50) patients post total hip replacement. Tools: Four tools were used in the current study: 1) Patient structured interview questionnaire, 2) Patients’ knowledge regarding joint replacement tool, 3) Patients’ compliance assessment tool. And 4) Western Ontario and Mac Master Universities Arthritis Questionnaire Results: (68.0%) of the studied patients have unsatisfactory total level of knowledge regarding the joint replacement, (80.0%) of them were non-compliant regarding post total hip replacement surgery, Also, (46%) of them had mild total outcomes post total hip replacement. Also, there was a highly statistically significant relation between total patient's level of knowledge, level of compliance and total outcomes post total hip replacement surgery. Conclusion: It can be concluded that, there were positive correlation between total level of knowledge score and total compliance score regarding post total hip replacement surgery among the studied patients. Meanwhile, there was a negative correlation between total outcomes score and total level of knowledge and compliance score regarding post total hip replacement surgery. Recommendations: A simplified and comprehensive guidelines booklet or pamphlet illustrating all instructions the patient may need post total hip replacement surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".