MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399547556 · doi:10.1183/20734735.0272-2023

The importance of addressing physical activity and exercise intolerance in our patients with COPD

2024· editorial· en· W4399547556 on OpenAlexaff
Roger Goldstein, José R. Jardim, Linda Nici, Jonathan Raskin, Martijn A. Spruit, Richard ZuWallack

Bibliographic record

VenueBreathe · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Canadian institutionsWest Park Healthcare CentreUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCOPDPhysical activityBit (key)Exercise intoleranceMedicinePhysical therapyPhysical exercisePhysical medicine and rehabilitationInternal medicineComputer scienceComputer securityHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<title>Extract</title> In one of his classical works, <italic>De Anima</italic> (circa 350 BCE), Aristotle considered movement to be an integral component of the essence of animal souls [1]. 2000 or so years later and viewed from the perspective of evolutionary theory, the ability to move is instrumental to survival and passing on one's genes through finding and acquiring nourishment, avoiding predators, reaching more favourable microclimates, and better locating a mate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBreatheSame topicChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchFrench-language works237,207