Hubungan antara Big Five Personality dengan Quarter Life Crisis pada Mahasiswa Tingkat Akhir di Universitas Negeri Padang
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to see the relationship between big five personality and quarter life crisis in final year students at Padang State University. This research uses quantitative methods with a correlational research design. The sample collection technique in this study used cluster sampling technique. The number of respondents in this study was 116 final year students at Padang State University. The instrument in this study uses the scale of quarter life crisis crisis adopted from researcher Salsabilla (2023). And Goldberg's (1992) International Personality Item Pool-Big Five Factor Marker 50 (IPIP-BFM-50) scale, adapted to Indonesian by Akhtar & Azwar (2018). The results of the analysis used Product-Moment correlation analysis and found a significant negative relationship between the big five personality dimensions, namely extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and with quarter life crisis in final year students at Padang State University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it