MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399555342 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114348

Decoding state-dependent cortical-cerebellar cellular functional connectivity in the mouse brain

2024· article· en· W4399555342 on OpenAlexafffund
Yuhao Yan, Timothy H. Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of British ColumbiaFondation Leducq
KeywordsNeuroscienceCerebellumCerebellar cortexBiologyCortex (anatomy)Cerebral cortexFunctional connectivityPopulationDeep cerebellar nucleiMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cortex and cerebellum form multi-synaptic reciprocal connections. We investigate the functional connectivity between single spiking cerebellar neurons and the population activity of the mouse dorsal cortex using mesoscale imaging. Cortical representations of individual cerebellar neurons vary significantly across different brain states but are drawn from a common set of cortical networks. These cortical-cerebellar connectivity features are observed in mossy fibers and Purkinje cells as well as neurons in different cerebellar lobules, albeit with variations across cell types and regions. Complex spikes of Purkinje cells preferably associate with the sensorimotor cortex, whereas simple spikes display more diverse cortical connectivity patterns. The spontaneous functional connectivity patterns align with cerebellar neurons' functional responses to external stimuli in a modality-specific manner. The tuning properties of subsets of cerebellar neurons differ between anesthesia and awake states, mirrored by state-dependent changes in their long-range functional connectivity patterns with mesoscale cortical activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207