MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399555603 · doi:10.1101/2024.06.11.598442

Optimizing Fed-Batch Processes with Dynamic Control Flux Balance Analysis

2024· preprint· en· W4399555603 on OpenAlexaff
Mathias Gotsmy, Dafni Giannari, Radhakrishnan Mahadevan, Jürgen Zanghellini

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKarush–Kuhn–Tucker conditionsFlux balance analysisProduction (economics)Process (computing)Mathematical optimizationDynamic balanceFlux (metallurgy)Optimal controlComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Function (biology)Constraint (computer-aided design)Batch processingControl (management)MathematicsEngineeringMaterials scienceEconomicsBiologyBioinformatics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fed-batch processes are prevalent in biotechnological industries, but design of experiments often results in sub-optimal conditions due to incomplete solution space characterization. We employ a single-level dynamic control (DC) algorithm for dynamic flux balance analysis (dFBA), enhancing efficiency by reducing Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) condition constraints and adapting the algorithm for predicting optimal process length. In a growth-decoupled plasmid DNA production case study, we predict the optimal feeding profile and switching time between growth and production phase. Comparing our algorithm to its predecessor shows a speed-up of at least a factor of four. When the process length is part of the objective function the speed-up becomes considerably larger.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionFrench-language works237,207