MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399563105 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2024.3413163

Universal Data Specification and Real-Time Data Streaming Architecture for Cloud-Based Battery Management Systems

2024· article· en· W4399563105 on OpenAlexaff
Dominic Karnehm, Akash Samanta, Michael Hohenegger, Nima Tashakor, Stefan M. Goetz, Manuel Kuder, Antje Neve, Sheldon S. Williamson

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputer scienceArchitectureReal-time computingDistributed computingOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Effective operation of a cloud-based electric vehicle (EV) battery management system (BMS) and control of associated modular multilevel inverters (MMIs) require real-time streaming of operational data. However, the existing data specifications are only suitable for hard-wired battery configuration and battery testers to store long-term historical data. This article fills this gap by introducing a standard data specification and cloud-based architecture to store and analyze operational data for implementing cloud-based BMS. The approach can simplify the implementation of cloud-based digital twinning of batteries and BMS. The proposed data specification will ease research and development in the battery platform. In addition, the specification can accommodate the configuration and control parameters of MMI-based reconfigurable battery packs and is also suitable for real-time data streaming. The effectiveness of the proposed data specification in cloud-based real-time data streaming as well as state estimation, and the provision of accommodating measurement error is demonstrated through the experimental data and analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicCloud Computing and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207