A Comprehensive Analysis of GaN-HEMT-Based Class E Resonant Inverter Using Modified Resonant Gate Driver Circuit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The class E resonant inverter is commonly used for various applications where low power and high frequency are needed. To investigate the performance of a class E resonant inverter, a comprehensive examination of the resonant gate driver circuits (RGDCs) is presented. In this work, a modified RGDC is implemented to drive the gallium nitride high electron mobility transistor (GaN-HEMT) of the class E resonant inverter. An analytical study of modified RGDC is carried out and compared with a conventional totem pole driver circuit. The simulation studies are conducted using the LTspice version XVII simulation software to observe the performance of both the driver circuits, i.e., the totem pole RGDC and the modified RGDC. The experimental testbed is set up for a modified RGDC drive GaN-HEMT-based class E resonant inverter to verify the theoretical as well as simulation findings. Further, the power losses are calculated by measuring the required parameters and efficiency curves are plotted by varying the load. The overall efficiency of the system, i.e., modified RGDC-based class E resonant inverter is found to be 95.42% at the optimal load resistance, <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">R<sub>L</sub></i> = 14.42 <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Ω</i>.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".