Retrieving data. Wait a few seconds and try to cut or copy again.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saperda candida (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) is native to the eastern USA and southeastern Canada. It was detected in Germany in 2008, where eradication efforts were undertaken. This beetle primarily infests woody hosts within the Rosaceae family, with Cydonia, Malus and Pyrus being significant cultivated hosts in North America. The larvae cause severe damage by girdling the trunks of young trees, leading to tree death. Improved pest management in the mid-20th century reduced its impact in orchards. Despite being an EPPO A1 Pest and an EU A1 quarantine pest, no classical biological control has been attempted. Potential natural enemies include 5 hymenopterous parasites (Cenocoelius saperdae, Echthrus niger, Monogonogastra agrili, Xylophrurus nubilipennis luctuosus and Sarcophaga sp.), which are not present in the EPPO region. Additional predators such as spiders, ants, click beetles, carabid beetles and several woodpecker species also contribute to natural control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.402 | 0.425 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".