Advancing Insights into Runway De-Icing: Combining Infrared Thermography and Raman Spectroscopy to Assess Ice Melt
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The “bare runway” principle aims to ensure passenger and employee safety by making runways more usable during winter conditions, allowing for easier removal of contaminants like snow and ice. Maintaining runway operations in winter is essential, but it involves considerable cost and environmental impacts. Greater knowledge about the de-icing and anti-icing performance of runway de-icing products (RDPs) optimizes operations. The ice melting test, as per the AS6170 standard, gauges the rate at which an RDP dissolves an ice mass to determine RDP effectiveness. Here, we introduce a novel integrated methodology for assessing RDP-related ice melting. We combine laboratory-based procedures with infrared thermography and Raman spectroscopy to monitor the condition of RDPs placed on ice. The plateau of maximum efficiency, marked by the most significant Raman peak intensity, corresponds to the peak minimum temperature, indicating optimal RDP performance. Beyond this point, RDP efficacy declines, and the system temperature, including melted contaminants and RDP, approaches ambient temperature. Effective RDP performance persists when the ambient temperature exceeds the mixture’s freezing point; otherwise, a freezing risk remains. The initial phases of RDP–ice contact involve exothermic reactions that generate brine, followed by heat exchange with surrounding ice to encourage melting. The final phase is complete ice melt, leaving only brine with reduced heat exchange on the surface. By quantifying these thermal and chemical changes, we gain a deeper understanding of RDP-related ice melting, and a more robust assessment can be provided to airports using RDPs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".