MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399588637 · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114345

CRISPR activation screens identify the SWI/SNF ATPases as suppressors of ferroptosis

2024· article· en· W4399588637 on OpenAlexaff
Kamakoti P. Bhat, Jinchu Vijay, Caroline K. Vilas, Jyoti Asundi, Jun Zou, Ted Lau, Xiaoyu Cai, Musaddeque Ahmed, Michał Kabza, Julie Weng, Jean‐Philippe Fortin, Aaron T. L. Lun, Steffen Durinck, Marc Hafner, Michael R. Costa, Xin Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsRoche (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGPX4Cell biologyChemistryCRISPRBiologyProgrammed cell deathGeneticsGeneBiochemistryGlutathioneGlutathione peroxidaseEnzymeApoptosis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ferroptosis is an iron-dependent cell death mechanism characterized by the accumulation of toxic lipid peroxides and cell membrane rupture. GPX4 (glutathione peroxidase 4) prevents ferroptosis by reducing these lipid peroxides into lipid alcohols. Ferroptosis induction by GPX4 inhibition has emerged as a vulnerability of cancer cells, highlighting the need to identify ferroptosis regulators that may be exploited therapeutically. Through genome-wide CRISPR activation screens, we identify the SWI/SNF (switch/sucrose non-fermentable) ATPases BRM (SMARCA2) and BRG1 (SMARCA4) as ferroptosis suppressors. Mechanistically, they bind to and increase chromatin accessibility at NRF2 target loci, thus boosting NRF2 transcriptional output to counter lipid peroxidation and confer resistance to GPX4 inhibition. We further demonstrate that the BRM/BRG1 ferroptosis connection can be leveraged to enhance the paralog dependency of BRG1 mutant cancer cells on BRM. Our data reveal ferroptosis induction as a potential avenue for broadening the efficacy of BRM degraders/inhibitors and define a specific genetic context for exploiting GPX4 dependency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.241

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell ReportsSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207