Ruptura ( <i>queer</i> ) a la lógica masculinista neoliberal colombiana: el caso de <i>Plegarias nocturnas</i> (2012) de Santiago Gamboa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En este artículo analizo la producción discursiva de Santiago Gamboa, especialmente el libro Plegarias nocturnas (2012), con el fin de caracterizar la sexopolítica imperante entre 2002 y 2010 en Colombia y sus efectos en las identidades ( queer ) minorizadas. A través de combinar los estudios culturales (latinoamericanos) con los estudios de género y la teoría queer , respondo a las siguientes preguntas ¿Cómo son representadas las identidades sexogenéricas minorizadas en Plegarias nocturnas ? y ¿Qué rol juegan las referencias literarias en Plegarias nocturnas en relación con dichas identidades y con la sexopolítica dominante en Colombia entre 2002 y 2010? Por lo tanto, este estudio contribuye a comprender la manera cómo las lógicas masculinistas dominantes en Colombia se han estructurado en la historia reciente del país y sus efectos en las subjetividades subordinadas al igual que a evidenciar el rol que el discurso literario puede tener para oponerse a dicha lógica.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".