MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399594614 · doi:10.3828/bhs.2023.42

Ruptura ( <i>queer</i> ) a la lógica masculinista neoliberal colombiana: el caso de <i>Plegarias nocturnas</i> (2012) de Santiago Gamboa

2024· article· es· W4399594614 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of Hispanic Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Feminist Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueerHumanitiesGender studiesArtHistorySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En este artículo analizo la producción discursiva de Santiago Gamboa, especialmente el libro Plegarias nocturnas (2012), con el fin de caracterizar la sexopolítica imperante entre 2002 y 2010 en Colombia y sus efectos en las identidades ( queer ) minorizadas. A través de combinar los estudios culturales (latinoamericanos) con los estudios de género y la teoría queer , respondo a las siguientes preguntas ¿Cómo son representadas las identidades sexogenéricas minorizadas en Plegarias nocturnas ? y ¿Qué rol juegan las referencias literarias en Plegarias nocturnas en relación con dichas identidades y con la sexopolítica dominante en Colombia entre 2002 y 2010? Por lo tanto, este estudio contribuye a comprender la manera cómo las lógicas masculinistas dominantes en Colombia se han estructurado en la historia reciente del país y sus efectos en las subjetividades subordinadas al igual que a evidenciar el rol que el discurso literario puede tener para oponerse a dicha lógica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.745
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it