MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Coupled δ56Fe and δ18O analysis of the Frere iron formation, Western Australia, and Paleoproterozoic ocean circulation

2024· article· en· W4399598553 on OpenAlexafffund
Urmidola Raye, Peir K. Pufahl, Sandeep Banerjee, Estelle Ricard, T. Kurtis Kyser

Bibliographic record

VenuePrecambrian Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersGeological Survey of Western AustraliaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaQueen's UniversityAcadia University
KeywordsGeologyCirculation (fluid dynamics)GeochemistryClimatologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• The 1.89 Ga Frere granular Fe formation was deposited on a redox stratified shelf. • Trend in whole-rock and magnetite δ 56 Fe data tracks changes in sea level. • The δ 56 Fe of iron formations are a robust tracer for Paleoproterozoic ocean circulation. • (Ce/Ce*) PAAS holds a primary seawater signature in spite of terrestrial input. • Primary δ 18 O values of minerals were overprinted by diagenesis. The Paleoproterozoic (ca.1.89 Ga) Frere Formation is a ca. 300-m-thick sedimentary succession of five stacked, Fe- and silicate-rich shallowing upwards cycles or parasequences that were deposited during marine transgression. Deposition in an oxygen-stratified water column is supported by the occurrence of magnetite-rich mudstones (anoxic and distal) beneath shallower, hematite- and chert-rich grainstones (suboxic and proximal). Minor (LREE/HREE) PAAS depletion and positive Ce anomalies in grainstones support this interpretation. Sequence stratigraphic relationships suggest that the Frere Formation accumulated on an unrimmed continental shelf associated with coastal upwelling of Fe. Large variations in oxygen isotope ratios ( δ 18 O) of magnetite (–0.6 ‰ ≤ δ 18 O ≤ +2.8 ‰, n = 12) and quartz (+8.8 ‰ ≤ δ 18 O ≤ +20.1 ‰, n = 11) from lithofacies composing the Frere Formation indicate that pristine δ 18 O of minerals were overprinted by diagenesis. Highly variable δ 18 O values calculated at 200 °C in equilibrium with quartz (–3.0 to + 8.3 ‰) and magnetite (+8.0 to + 12.7 ‰) suggest that fluids with heterogeneous δ 18 O evolved through oxygen isotope exchange between minerals and porewater in accumulating sediment during diagenesis. The Fe isotope ratios ( δ 56 Fe) of bulk rock (–0.50 ‰ ≤ δ 56 Fe ≤ +1.55 ‰, n = 20) and magnetite separates (–0.09 ‰ ≤ δ 56 Fe ≤ +2.06 ‰, n = 11) from deeper anoxic and shallow suboxic paleoenvironments define a decreasing trend through stratigraphically stacked parasequences. The high δ 56 Fe values of magnetite (+0.7 ‰ to + 2.06 ‰) characterizing the base of the Frere Formation is interpreted to reflect equilibrium isotopic fractionation between dissolved Fe 2+ aq and freshly precipitated Fe-(oxyhydr)oxide (Fe(OH) 3 ) resulting from sluggish recharge of Fe 2+ aq from deeper shelf environments. These high δ 56 Fe values of magnetite from shallow paleoenvironments may also reflect microbial dissimilatory Fe reduction at the seafloor. As sea level rose, continued deepening and encroachment of a well-mixed water mass increased the oxidation of Fe 2+ aq , which ultimately increased the influence of kinetic isotopic fractionation between Fe 2+ aq and Fe(OH) 3 . Such a process produced δ 56 Fe compositions of magnetite that gradually decrease through the stratigraphic thickness of the Frere Formation (+2‰ to −0.1 ‰). Thus, Fe isotopic data framed in a sequence stratigraphic context provides greater insight into water column processes on Fe-rich, oxygen stratified Paleoproterozoic and Mesoproterozoic shelves, as well as geologically younger restricted basins with a redox gradient.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrecambrian ResearchSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207